Types of Biological Fillers and Their Characteristics

Views: 0     Author: Site Editor     Publish Time: 2025-06-16      Origin: Site

Inquire

wechat sharing button
line sharing button
twitter sharing button
facebook sharing button
linkedin sharing button
pinterest sharing button
whatsapp sharing button
sharethis sharing button
Types of Biological Fillers and Their Characteristics

Types of Biological Fillers and Their Characteristics

MBBR media

I. Classification and Properties by Material

Material Type Typical Materials Performance Characteristics Application Scenarios
Polymer Materials Polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polyvinyl chloride (PVC) Strong chemical stability, acid-base corrosion resistance, density close to water (easy to suspend), hydrophobic surface requiring modification (e.g., hydrophilic coating), service life 5-8 years. Municipal wastewater and industrial wastewater (e.g., food, chemical) treatment in aerobic/anaerobic conditions.
Inorganic Materials Ceramsite, volcanic rock, zeolite, activated carbon Large specific surface area (100-500 m²/m³), rich pore structure, strong adsorption (e.g., activated carbon), resistant to biodegradation, but heavy (bulk density 1.2-2.5 g/cm³), prone to clogging. Advanced treatment (nitrogen and phosphorus removal), wastewater containing heavy metals or refractory organics.
Natural Materials Wood, straw, shells, coral bone Wide source, low cost, rough surface easy for biofilm formation, but easy to degrade (service life 1-2 years), may release organic carbon affecting water quality. Decentralized rural wastewater treatment, low-cost ecological projects.
Composite Materials Polymer + metal oxides (e.g., Fe₃O₄), polymer + activated carbon Combining advantages of multiple materials, such as magnetic fillers (easy for recovery), adsorption-biological degradation synergy (activated carbon + PE), higher cost. High-difficulty industrial wastewater (e.g., pharmaceutical, electroplating), scenarios requiring enhanced adsorption and biodegradation.

II. Classification and Applications by Structural Form

(1) Suspended Fillers (Commonly Used in MBBR/IFAS Processes)

  • Characteristics: Freely suspended under water flow or aeration, fully contacting wastewater without frame (support) fixation.

  • Typical Types:

    • Structure: Plastic skeleton core wrapped with fibers or activated carbon particles (e.g., MBBR + activated carbon composite fillers).

    • Advantage: Combining biological attachment and adsorption functions, suitable for simultaneous removal of COD and heavy metals (e.g., electroplating wastewater).

    • Structure: Polyethylene fiber filaments tie to a central rope, in bundle form (e.g., soft fiber fillers, elastic three-dimensional fillers), specific surface area 800-1200 m²/m³.

    • Advantage: Flexible fiber filaments swing easily, high mass transfer efficiency, but prone to agglomeration after long-term operation (requires regular agitation).

    • Structure: PE/PP material, internal porous or mesh (e.g., Kaldnes K1, K3 fillers), specific surface area 500-800 m²/m³.

    • Advantage: Good fluidity, avoiding dead zones, suitable for high-load wastewater (e.g., chemical, food wastewater).

    1. Hollow Spherical/Cylindrical Fillers

    2. Braided/Fibrous Fillers

    3. Composite Suspended Fillers

(2) Fixed Bed Fillers (Commonly Used in Biological Filters, Biological Contact Oxidation Tanks)

  • Characteristics: Stacked or fixed in the reactor to form a fixed bed layer, requiring control of water flow velocity to prevent clogging.

  • Typical Types:

    • Structure: Irregular particles such as ceramsite, Raschig rings, Pall rings, specific surface area 50-200 m²/m³.

    • Advantage: Low cost, suitable for scenarios with small load fluctuations (e.g., rural domestic wastewater), but high bulk density and water flow resistance.

    • Structure: Ceramic or metal corrugated plate laminations (e.g., metal hole plate corrugated packings), porosity 90%-95%, specific surface area 200-500 m²/m³.

    • Advantage: Extremely high mass transfer efficiency, suitable for nitrogen removal (e.g., biological aerated filter BAF), but high cost and easy to clog.

    • Structure: PVC/PP made hexagonal honeycombs (e.g., honeycomb inclined tube fillers) or corrugated pipes, specific surface area 100-300 m²/m³.

    • Advantage: Uniform water distribution, suitable for low-load municipal wastewater (e.g., secondary treatment), but prone to sludge accumulation (requires regular backwashing).

    1. Honeycomb/Tubular Fillers

    2. Structured Packings

    3. Random Packings

(3) Membrane Carrier Fillers (Derivatives of MBR Processes)

  • Characteristics: Combining biofilm with membrane separation, both biological degradation and filtration functions.

  • Typical Types:

    • Structure: Polyethylene hollow fiber bundles (inner diameter 0.1-1 mm), specific surface area 1000-2000 m²/m³.

    • Advantage: High membrane flux (10-20 L/(m²·h)), suitable for reclaimed water reuse (e.g., advanced treatment of municipal wastewater).

    • Structure: PVDF membrane sheets fixed on a support, forming a biofilm on the surface, pore size 0.1-0.4 μm.

    • Advantage: Excellent effluent quality (SS ≤1 mg/L), but membrane fouling requires regular chemical cleaning (CIP).

    1. Flat Membrane Fillers

    2. Hollow Fiber Membrane Fillers

III. Classification and Innovative Applications by Functional Characteristics

  1. Special Fillers for Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal
    • Modified zeolite fillers: Adsorb ammonia nitrogen through ion exchange (adsorption capacity 5-10 mg/g), while providing attachment sites for denitrifying bacteria.

    • Iron-based fillers: Polymer fillers loaded with Fe³+, achieving synergistic phosphorus removal through chemical precipitation (Fe³+ + PO₄³- → FePO₄) and biological phosphorus removal, with phosphorus removal rate over 90%.

  2. Toxic-Resistant Industrial Fillers
    • Activated carbon-loaded fillers: PE skeleton wrapped with activated carbon particles, adsorbing toxic substances like benzene series while domesticating toxic-resistant flora (e.g., phenol-degrading bacteria).

    • Magnetic fillers: PP + Fe₃O₄ composite material, enhancing filler recovery through magnetic fields, suitable for wastewater containing heavy metals (e.g., removal of electroplating nickel, cadmium).

  3. Special Fillers for Anaerobic Treatment
    • Anaerobic granular sludge carriers: Macroporous polypropylene fillers (pore size 5-10 mm), promoting the formation of anaerobic granular sludge and increasing methane yield (e.g., UASB process improvement).

    • Anaerobic ammonium oxidation (Anammox) fillers: Rough surface (e.g., volcanic rock) accelerates Anammox bacteria biofilm formation, with nitrogen removal load reaching 1-2 kgN/(m³·d).

IV. Development Trends of New Fillers

Technical Direction Innovations Application Prospects
Nanomaterial Modification Fillers loaded with nano-TiO₂/ZnO, photocatalytic degradation of organic matter (e.g., antibiotic wastewater), while inhibiting algae growth. Advanced treatment of high-difficulty organic wastewater (pharmaceutical, pesticide).
3D Printed Structured Fillers Customized pore structures based on reactor flow fields (e.g., bionic coral skeletons), optimizing mass transfer efficiency (oxygen utilization increased by 30%). Compact treatment of high-load industrial wastewater (e.g., beer brewing wastewater).
Degradable Environment-Friendly Fillers Starch-based/polylactic acid (PLA) materials, naturally degrading after service life, avoiding secondary pollution. Decentralized wastewater treatment in rural or ecologically sensitive areas.
Intelligent Responsive Fillers pH/temperature-sensitive hydrogel coatings, adaptively regulating microbial activity (e.g., releasing enzyme-promoting factors at low temperatures). Stable operation in winter for cold regions (e.g., northern municipal wastewater).

V. Key Principles for Filler Selection

  1. Water Quality Characteristics: Choose suspended fillers (e.g., MBBR) for high-concentration wastewater, large-pore fillers (e.g., ceramsite) for wastewater containing suspended solids, and adsorption-biological composite fillers for toxic wastewater.

  2. Process Type: Select fixed beds for aerobic processes (e.g., contact oxidation), macroporous suspended fillers for anaerobic processes, and modified inorganic fillers for nitrogen and phosphorus removal.

  3. Economy: Prioritize low-cost materials (e.g., PE/PP) for municipal wastewater, and accept high-cost, high-performance fillers (e.g., activated carbon composite fillers) for industrial wastewater.

Conclusion

The diversity of biological filler types meets the needs of different wastewater treatment scenarios: from basic PE suspension balls to nano-modified intelligent fillers, their core functions always focus on "improving biological attachment efficiency, enhancing mass transfer performance, and adapting to complex water quality". In engineering applications, it is necessary to combine wastewater pollutant characteristics (COD, nitrogen, phosphorus, toxicity), treatment scale (50-10000 m³/d), and cost budget to select the most suitable filler type, so as to achieve the treatment goals of "high efficiency, economy, and sustainability".


CONTACT US

Phone:0086-18262034922
Email:lisa@jiuqiangmachine.com
Add:qingfeng village, leyu town,Zhangjiagang City, Suzhou City, Jiangsu Province

QUICK LINKS

PRODUCTS CATEGORY

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

Copyright @ 2024 Zhangjiagang Jiuqiang Machinery Manufacturering Co., ltd